Posts Tagged 2010

Commentary on release of Eurovision televote and jury vote details by EBU

The EBU has just released jury vote and televote details for the recent Eurovision Song Contest final and two semi finals, which throw up some interesting findings. These details can be now viewed (http://www NULL.eurovision NULL.tv/page/news?id=18893&_t=EBU+reveals+split+voting+outcome%2C+surprising+results) on the official Eurovision webpage. In this post, I will tease out some of the more interesting trends emerging from a comparison of the televote and jury vote patterns. Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

No Comments

ERN Inaugural Symposium: audio

Audio recordings of all the presentations from the ERN Inaugural Symposium held at the University of Oslo in Norway on Friday 28 May 2010 are available below, along with abstracts of presentations.

WELCOME
Arnt Maasø – Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Norway

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Maaso_Arnt NULL.mp3)

INTRODUCTION: Setting the Agenda for Eurovision Studies
Toni Sant – School of Arts & New Media, University of Hull, Scarborough Campus, UK.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Sant_Toni NULL.mp3)

ERN MEMBER PRESENTATIONS

The Eurovision Song Contest and the problem of “quality”
Mari Pajala – Media Studies Department, University of Turku, Finland.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Pajala_Mari NULL.mp3)

Eurovision:  It’s oh so queer
Peter Rehberg – Editor-in-chief, Männer magazine, Germany.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Rehberg_Peter NULL.mp3)

Eurovision and the “New” Europe
Karen Fricker – Department of Drama and Theatre, Royal Holloway, University of London & Milija Gluhovic – School of Theatre, Performance and Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick, UK.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Fricker_Gluhovic NULL.mp3)

Nation Branding and Image Building Through Popular Culture: A Case Study of Estonia and Ukraine
Paul Jordan – Department of Central and East European Studies, University of Glasgow, UK.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Jordan_Paul NULL.mp3)

National Differences at the Eurovision Song Contest: The Seven Essential & Interconnected “Dimensions of Meaning”
Irving Wolther – HMTH Institute for Journalism and Communication Studies, Hannover, Germany.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Wolther_Irving NULL.mp3)

The Global Networking of Irish Eurovision Song Contest Fans
Brian Singleton – Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Singleton_Brian NULL.mp3)

RESPONSE
Apostolos Lampropoulos – Department of French, University of Cyprus.

Play (http://eurovisionresearch NULL.net/audio/20100528-Lampropoulos_Apostolos NULL.mp3)

, , , , ,

No Comments

A Borda-less Eurovision

As everyone in the ERN knows Eurovision uses  a Borda count to tabulate scores. Each country allocates points to their 10 favourites. However, rather than allocate 10 points to the first ranked and 9 to the second, first place earns 12 points; 2nd 10 points. The idea is to skew the vote in favour of top-ranked scores…and to reduce the possibility of tie scores.

Using the awesome data available from here (http://www NULL.myledbury NULL.co NULL.uk/eurovision/)I yanked the Borda count down to a normal count. Pretty simple really: convert the 10 point allocations to 9, the 12 point ones to 10.  Doesn’t change the results, but does give a clearer idea of how closely the songs scored.  The italicized songs are the top 10 for each night. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments